Ren’s Death Note Discussion: L and Panopticism

*This discussion will involve some possible spoilers if you haven’t already watched the anime adaption or original manga of Death Note, you have been warned.*

My thoughts on how L operates as a panoptic force in the Death Note universe.

 First Things First

Death Note:

‘Death Note (デスノート Desu Nōto?) is a Japanese manga series created by writer Tsugumi Ohba and manga artist Takeshi Obata. It centers on Light Yagami, a high school student who discovers a supernatural notebook, the titular “Death Note”. This notebook grants its user the ability to kill anyone whose name and face they know. The series centers around Light’s subsequent attempts to create and rule a world “cleansed of evil” as “God” using the notebook, and the efforts of a detective known as L to stop him.’

-Wikipedia Summary


Jeremy Bentham, a British philosopher, came up with a plan for a prison that would allow every criminal to be observed with as few guards as possible. The Guard-tower would sit in the centre of the prison and the cells would encircle it. Every prisoner could be surveyed constantly via this system. A panopticon is basically a space where everything can be seen. Foucault, a French social theorist and philosopher, ran with Bentham’s prison plan ideas and discussed them in a metaphorical sense when he analysed the mechanisms for surveillance that exist all around us. Schools, factories, hospitals. All kinds of institutions can be used to watch us and instill in us the discipline required to act correctly.

I will be loosely using Foucault’s thoughts on panopticism in this discussion.

Plan of the Panoticon

Plan of the Panopticon

The Discussion

L is a major part of the panoptic mechanisms in place in the Death Note universe.

What makes L a panoptic force

1) His constant presence. One of L’s first tricks involves narrowing down the area Kira lives in by controlling TV broadcasts. This trick gives us a taste of L’s capacity to see things on a global scale. He works telescopically by drawing Kira’s location into focus.

2) His detachment from the criminal (initially). The inmates held within the panopticon are meant to be, in Foucault’s words,  ‘the object of information, never a subject in communication’ . L does start out his investigation by testing Kira’s powers and observing things as if they were all objects in a game. Part of the breakdown of L’s power and his position as a threat to Light is that he becomes familiar with his suspect. He starts to question his own suspicions. When L makes Light ‘a subject in communication’, L’s power diminishes. The problem is that L cannot operate as a cold machine. He should only mine Light for information as if he were an object, but he does more than that. He is influenced by emotional needs. He recognizes that he shares some personality traits with Light, or at least with Light’s ‘top student’ persona, and cannot truly get past that. Near does a better job, I think, at maintaining some distance from his subject.

3) His anonymity. L works hard to maintain a degree of anonymity. He does this via various means, including hiding his face and his full name. When we are first introduced to him in the manga it is during an international policing conference where not even the police know his true identity. To trick Kira he hides behind the alias ‘Lind L. Tailor’. He steals the name from a criminal who he has pretend to be him on TV, thereby testing Kira’s method of killing people. With Lind L. Tailor’s name and face, Light kills him under the premise that he is L. L reveals the deception and challenges Kira to kill him without knowing his name and face, but it simply is not possible. L’s anonymity gives him power. And he knows it; otherwise he wouldn’t safeguard his identity so thoroughly.  The police who abandon the task force are well aware of the need for anonymity if their surveillance powers are to be of any use to the investigation. Many leave because they know how easy it is for their identities to be revealed. Anonymity is a requirement for safeguarding panoptic powers.

Part of what makes panopticism ethical is that the people that become part of its mechanics are somehow de-indivdualised. The power they wield in the machine doesn’t give them god-like status because they are performing their function in the name of something bigger than themselves rather than in their own name. In other words, they serve their purpose like a cog in a machine not as if they are the machine in its entirety.  The machine is not reliant on one particular person, anyone is replaceable. L’s role does have a tinge of this replaceable cog characteristic. L has heirs and his alias is adopted by multiple people throughout the series, including Light himself. L is not an irreplaceable cog in the panoptic machine, despite his impressive intellectual skills. The Death Note universe contains multiple intellectual people who can individually, and in some cases collectively, meet L’s levels of intellect. L is therefore  replaceable.

Why L’s Panopticism did not succeed

Panoptic l

1) Light was aware of the presence of a panoptic gaze early on which meant he was very careful to work around it. He also had inside access and knowledge of the ways in which the panoptic mechanisms attempting to catch him worked. This is evidenced by his cunning plan to evade the prying eyes of the surveillance cameras that are placed in his home.

Foucault  says  ‘he who is subjected to a field of visibility, and who knows it, assumes responsibility for the constraints of power; he makes them play spontaneously upon himself; he inscribes in himself the power relation in which he simultaneously plays both roles; he becomes the principle of his own subjection’. This suggests that the power of surveillance makes us internalise this power and turn it on ourselves. We discipline ourselves because we know we are being watched, even if we aren’t sure where the watching eyes are exactly placed.  Light is aware that he is being watched but this does not prevent him from continuing to use the Death Note. The problem is his lack of respect or trust in the society (and the ideals and morals associated with said society) that watches him. He develops a god complex that makes him believe that his application of justice is the only correct form of power. Light refuses to subject himself to the discipline asked of him by the positive laws that provide order in society regardless of their external panoptic gaze.

2) Light’s close relationship with panoptic forces. The fact Light’s father was part of the panoptic mechanisms in place in his society meant he could threaten the rationality of the law. The law could not truly be emotionally detached from its subject because of Light’s blood connection to it. There would always be the ‘but he’s the son of the Police Investigation Bureau Chief’ issue, and that held the investigators back even when they were investigating him directly. Light was also a top student. Educational establishments are part of the panoptic system (L confirms as much when he insinuates himself into Light’s college life). But Light portrays himself as the model student, thereby making himself appear to be the ultimate conformist. Light’s almost too perfect in this respect and this illusion of ultimate conformity is part of what triggers L’s suspicions. Nevertheless, Light’s positive reputation, whilst suspicious in itself, always complicates the premise that he is evil because it is almost too difficult to accept that such a gifted person is so morally flawed by modern cultural standards.

3) The Shinigami. There were forces at work that could not be seen, even by L. The input of the Shinigami and the power they conferred on Light and Misa was something L could not account for. The Shinigami also represent a separate panoptic force.

Final Thoughts

L was ultimately beaten by Light. Light used the shinigami, the one force L had no chance of being able to see. against L. Surveillance was key to L’s investigation but it wasn’t until his dying moments that he finally saw and accepted that Light really was Kira. I say L’s panopticism failed because, although he ultimately discovered the truth in the end, he did not manage to stop Light.

But this is not to say that panopticism failed. A key characteristic of the panoptic machine, as I discussed earlier, is that parts are replaceable. Panoptic machinery exists, to an extent, outside of the bounds of individual mortality.  The machine still functioned after L’s death and it managed to overcome Light despite his attempts to poison the mechanisms from within.

EDIT: Also, having discussed the topic further in the comments (see below), there is the issue of Light’s decline which leads him to contribute to his own undoing. He is a degraded version of himself by the end. The panoptic machine, which has never truly stopped working throughout the whole story, is only then able to catch him because he is a compromised intellectual force, compromised by his own arrogance.

Extra Point


Of course, there is another all-seeing eye at play in the Death Note universe: that of the Shinigami. It’s Ryuk that has the final say in ending Light’s life. Ryuk belongs to a legal system that works simultaneously alongside human legal systems. The Shinigami control the balance between life and death. They make contracts (Misa’s acquisition of Shinigami Eyes in exchange for half of her life), they set rules, they make promises that they always fulfil (Ryuk’s promise that he will be the one to take Light’s life in the end). Light is surveyed by two major forces throughout the story and in the end he cannot breakdown or break free of the machinery of either.

Next time on Death Note Discussion: ‘Light and Natural vs. Positive Law’ (if you want to read my ramblings again, that is 😉 )


9 responses to “Ren’s Death Note Discussion: L and Panopticism

  1. Yup, I agree with this, but when it comes to the case of Near, part of the reason why he was able to defeat Light was Kira’s arrogance, which was at its boiling point. This resulted in Kira making a lot of mistakes. The simplest strategy that Light could have adopted against Near was to temporarily put his “Kira” persona on hiatus. That would have helped him to gather more details regarding Near and to come up with a strategy atleast.

    • You make a very interesting point about Near that I hadn’t considered yet!

      One of Light’s crucial errors is when he assumes that with L gone he doesn’t have to be quite as careful and on the ball, and Light gets away with being more blasé about his approach to things over a prolonged period of time so when Near’s net draws in we aren’t seeing the Light we knew from the earlier half of the story taken down, we’re seeing quite a different version of Light whose arrogance, as you say, has reached boiling point by this stage of his life. So, it’s not that Near necessarily reaches or surpasses L’s levels of competence and that is why Light is beaten, Light is the one who beats himself. He’s a degraded version of himself by that point.

      Thank you so much for your comment! It’s made me think about things even more 😀

      • My pleasure, just a suggestion, you should try analyzing Code Geass in future posts, because it is synonymous with Death Note among anime fans.

      • I completely agree — and this is a major reason why the last third of the series didn’t hold my attention as strongly as the rest. It was that closeness with L, the very high stakes intellectual competition between Light and L that really kept me interested. When L was out of the picture, as you said, Light got arrogant and lazy, and Near (though interesting) was much further removed from it all.

        Maybe I would have liked it more if we’d seen glimpses of Near and Mello (and their rivalry) from the beginning of the series, so that when Near took over for L, it felt more natural and not as much of a let down. It almost feels a slight to Near’s cleverness and competency, because we saw so much less of him in comparison, and everything was getting so tiring by that point in any case. Alas!

        Still, such a great show, and an awesome post! I can’t wait to read your next one!

      • Yeah, I also found that last third of the show a lot less gripping. Near needed the distance from Light to win in practical terms but as a spectator I yearned for that energy that existed between L and Light. L and Light together formed a balance of power that fizzled with energy and kept their souls alive, Light kills that fizzle in himself along with L, and it is downhill from there.

        In the final sections it became obvious that years of having this power and control over life and death had really made Light a shadow of the carefully manipulative, intellectual powerhouse he was in earlier episodes. It’s interesting because there seems to be this moral imperative to see Light fail so the story provides us with an account of his fall. But the fall isn’t pretty or necessarily enjoyable. Maybe because there was something in us that related to that young man who first picked up the notebook? I don’t know. The ultimate power corrupts absolutely. In a way Light becomes a disappointment. Another human made dirty by power. You wonder who he could have been if he hadn’t found the notebook at all. You wonder who or what he would be if he was free of a corruptible human core. Did he only kill at all because he is /so/ human? Or, I don’t know where I’m going with this, I’m just mumbling out loud now 😛

        Having Near in the background in some way from an earlier stage would have made the transition much more smooth. I can see that they wanted to focus on the balance between L and Light in the earlier half and Near and Mello might be awkward appendages to that central relationship dynamic, but it feels unfair that they aren’t given the opportunity to shine as much when it is their work that contributes to Light’s ultimate downfall. The downfall is much less satisfying than it maybe could have been because I felt less attached to and less invested in Near and Mello. I guess the endgame played out like it was more Light’s loss than Near’s win.

  2. Pingback: Weekly Recap| Jun 8-14, 2014 | Oh, the Books!·

  3. Hmm, visiting a panopticon sounds like a pretty scary adventure (what if there is a riot??), so I’m glad it didn’t become a thing, but I can’t deny being intrugued by the idea 😉

    *spoiler alert*

    Yeeeah, L’s “panoptic gaze” could never have won against a Shinigami who has like the Ultimate Gaze or something like that (haha), so no matter how smart he was, Kira’s win was inevitable. It was hard to predict when or how he would win, but it was only a matter of time. But then, Kira is “just” a human after all, so in the end had to fall as well….
    And I agree with Kelley, with L’s death Light lost his “archenemy” (and motive to WIN) and become sort aimless and yes, lazy. I loved the series, but it’s undeniable that things weren’t the same after that. (and, thqh,I kinda wish it ended there…)

    *spoiler over*

    And I second Rahul’s idea of analyzing Code Geass next (if you have watched it, that is)

  4. Pingback: End of Year Bookish Survey 2014 | Fearless Facade·

  5. Maybe we can take this even further. If the actual purpose of Panopticism is to make people act according to the rules, it fails in Death Note. As you said, the constant observation doesn’t make Light conform. It makes him pretend to conform. Isn’t this actually a main issue in DN? How society fails when valueing the public image so much? Light is the perfect example, sadly. He kills but he is a narcissist and can’t live with the idea of not being perfect in other people’s and therefore his eyes. That’s probably the main reason he chooses to act as Kira (e.g. in the second arc, he thinks that people will soon accept Kira as their god. Also his gleeful smiles when people on the net praise him as just). So, applying Panopticism to DN not only as a force for deduction but also as a societal concept might be interesting. Thanks for bringing this to attention 🙂
    (I know I’m more than one year late to the game but … whatever :D)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s